| IBM Research: Press Resources | Return to Web version |
IBM Fellow
Dennard, continuing on his path of achievement, subsequently took his work several steps further. Working with co-workers, he developed and verified scaling theory -- an orderly scientific approach to determining and dealing with the challenges posed in designing and building ever-smaller computer devices on silicon chips.
Ironically, Dennard says the inspiration for his development of the single-transistor DRAM emanated from a presentation by in-house competitors in the Research division at a 1966 conference "that really discouraged me" because "they were talking about all the great things they were doing" with thin-film magnetic memory. But their simple approach to a memory element -- "a piece of magnetic material and a couple of lines passing near it" -- made him look for ways to simplify his approach which, at that point, was a complex six-transistor arrangement for storage of a single bit. After working for several months, Dennard reached the realization that a single field-effect transistor and data line could accomplish both the writing and reading of charge stored in a capacitor, and within a year IBM had been granted a patent on one of the key technologies of the computer age.
Robert Dennard was a young Texas-bred scientist (with a Ph.D. from Carnegie Institute of Technology) who thought he knew where he was headed when he arrived at IBM in 1958. He figured he'd "go to IBM and learn a lot of good stuff, and then maybe go out to a smaller company and work my way up. I figured I'd spend about three years." A short chuckle sets up the obvious punch line: "That was 46 years ago."
These days, Dennard could be said to have come full circle on his work, focusing his attention on how far the current silicon chips can be taken, and whether the practical limits of scaling are being approached. Noting that devices now measure as little as 1/10 of a micron (a 100:1 reduction in scale from when he began work in the field more than 30 years ago), he says that "we're getting pretty close to the physical limits, in the sense that as we continue to make them smaller, we don't get the returns in performance and lower power and density because of some fundamental limitations.
"I'm interested in finishing up this thing that I helped get started. And, as we're getting to the limits of this technology, the questions are even more interesting than they've been for a few years, because we're looking for ways around some of the problems. And there are lots of interesting possibilities that need to be evaluated." And limits to be tested.